Wikipedia - Rosuvastatin

Rosuvastatin
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(3R,5S,6E)-7-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(N-methylmethanesulfonamido)-6-(propan-2-yl)pyrimidin-5-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid
Identifiers
CAS number 287714-41-4
ATC code C10AA07
PubChem CID 6439133
DrugBank APRD00546
ChemSpider 393589
Chemical data
Formula C22H28FN3O6S 
Mol. mass 481.539
SMILES eMolecules & PubChem
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability 20%
Metabolism Liver
Half-life 19 hours
Excretion Urine / Faeces
Therapeutic considerations
Pregnancy cat. D(AU) X(US)
Legal status Prescription Only (S4) (AU) POM (UK) ?-only (US)
Routes oral
 YesY(what is this?)  (verify)

Rosuvastatin (Crestor, AstraZeneca) is a member of the drug class of statins, used to treat high cholesterol and related conditions, and to prevent cardiovascular disease. It was developed by Shionogi.

Contents

[edit] Presentation

Rosuvastatin is available as Crestor in tablet form (5, 10, 20, or 40 mg) for oral administration. Tablets are pink, round or oval (40 mg), biconvex, film-coated, and imprinted with "ZD4522" and tablet strength.[1] Japanese approval is in the dose range of 2.5 mg to 20 mg; therefore, smaller dose tablet forms might also be available outside the United States. Note that 97% of worldwide sales have been at or below the 20 mg dose.

[edit] Structure

Rosuvastatin has structural similarities with most other synthetic statins, eg. Atorvastatin, Cerivastatin, Pitavastatin, but rosuvastatin unusually also contains sulphur.

Crestor is actually Rosuvastatin calcium.[2] Calcium presumably replacing the H in the carboxylic acid group on the right of the 2 structure diagrams.

[edit] Mechanism of action

Rosuvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, having a mechanism of action similar to other statins.[3] Its approximate elimination half life is 19 hours and its time to peak plasma concentration are reached in 3–5 hours following oral administration.[4]

Putative beneficial effects of rosuvastatin therapy on chronic heart failure may be negated by increases in collagen turnover markers as well as a reduction in plasma Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) levels in patients with chronic heart failure.[5]

[edit] Indications and regulation

Rosuvastatin is approved for the treatment of high LDL cholesterol (dyslipidemia), total cholesterol (hypercholesterolemia) and/or triglycerides (hypertriglyceridemia).[1]

As of 2004, rosuvastatin had been approved in 154 countries and launched in 56. Approval in the United States by the FDA came on August 12, 2003.[6]

In 2008, research emerged that rosuvastatin could reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke, and other vascular complications in patients with elevated C-reactive protein but no other risk factors.[7] This could strongly impact medical practice by placing many patients on statin prophylaxis that otherwise would have been untreated.

The results of the JUPITER trial (2008) suggested that rosuvastatin may decrease the relative risk of heart attack and stroke in patients without hyperlipidemia.[8]

The AURORA trial randomized 2776 patients undergoing hemodialysis due to kidney damage to receive either rosuvastatin or placebo. The randomized, double-blind study (2005 to 2009) found no difference in the two groups in the primary end point, a combination of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The study found no difference in all-cause mortality among this population at a mean follow up of 3.8 years. [9]

[edit] Effects on cholesterol levels

The effects of rosuvastatin on LDL cholesterol are dose-related. At the 10 mg dose, the average LDL cholesterol reduction was found to be 46% in one trial. Increasing the dose from 10 mg to 40 mg gave a modest additional 9% absolute reduction in LDL levels (55% below baseline levels).[10]

[edit] FDA Advisory for Asian Patients

According to the FDA, the risk of myopathy during rosuvastatin therapy may be increased in Asian-Americans.

"Because Asians appear to process the drug differently, half the standard dose can have the same cholesterol-lowering benefit in those patients, though a full dose could increase the risk of side effects, a study by the drug's manufacturer, AstraZeneca, indicated." [11]

Therefore physicians should start Asian patients at the lowest dose level. [12]

[edit] Marketing and competition

[edit] Patent protection

The main patent protecting rosuvastatin (RE37,314 - due to expire in 2016) was challenged as being an improper reissue of an earlier patent. This challenge was rejected in 2010, confirming protection until 2016. [13] [14]

[edit] Marketing

The drug was billed as a super-statin during its clinical development; the claim was that it offered high potency and improved cholesterol reduction compared to rivals in the class. The main competitors to rosuvastatin are atorvastatin (Lipitor) and ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin). However, people can also combine ezetimibe with either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin and other agents on their own, for somewhat similar augmented response rates. So far, some published information for comparing rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and ezetimibe/simvastatin results is available, but many of the relevant studies are still in progress.[3]

First launched in 2003, sales of rosuvastatin were $129 million and $908 million in 2003 and 2004, respectively, with a total patient treatment population of over 4 million by the end of 2004.[citation needed] Typical per patient costs to the UK NHS are £18.03-26.02/month (compared to £0.85-1.37/month for simvastatin).

[edit] Debate & criticisms

In October 2003, several months after its introduction in Europe, Richard Horton, the editor of the medical journal The Lancet, criticized the way Crestor had been introduced. "AstraZeneca's tactics in marketing its cholesterol-lowering drug, rosuvastatin, raise disturbing questions about how drugs enter clinical practice and what measures exist to protect patients from inadequately investigated medicines," according to his editorial. The Lancet's editorial position is that the data for Crestor’s superiority relies too much on extrapolation from the lipid profile data (surrogate endpoints) and too little on hard clinical endpoints which are available for other statins which had been on the market longer. The manufacturer responded by stating that few drugs had been tested so successfully on so many patients. In correspondence published in The Lancet, AstraZeneca's CEO Sir Tom McKillop called the editorial "flawed and incorrect" and slammed the journal for making "such an outrageous critique of a serious, well-studied medicine."[15]

In 2004, the consumer interest organization Public Citizen filed a Citizen's Petition with the FDA asking that Crestor be withdrawn from the US market. On March 11, 2005, the FDA issued a letter to Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D. of Public Citizen both denying the petition and providing an extensive detailed analysis of findings which demonstrated no basis for concerns about rosuvastatin compared with the other statins approved for marketing in the United States.[16]

[edit] Myopathy

As with all statins, there is a concern of rhabdomyolysis, a severe undesired side effect. The FDA has indicated that "it does not appear that the risk [of rhabdomyolysis] is greater with Crestor than with other marketed statins", but has mandated that a warning about this side effect, as well as a kidney toxicity warning, be added to the product label.[2]

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ a b "Core Data Sheet, Crestor Tablets" (PDF). AstraZeneca PLC. June 17 2003. http://www.crestor.info/gUserFiles/CRESTOR_CDS_10_40_mg_FINAL_170603.pdf. Retrieved 2005-03-20.  - NOTE: this is provider-oriented information and should not be used without the supervision of a physician.
  2. ^ a b "FDA Alert (03/2005) - Rosuvastatin Calcium (marketed as Crestor) Information". The Food and Drug Administration. March 14, 2005. http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/rosuvastatin/default.htm. Retrieved 2005-03-20.  - This page is subject to change; the date reflects the last revision date.
  3. ^ a b Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, et al. (2006). "Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial" (PDF). JAMA 295 (13): 1556–65. doi:10.1001/jama.295.13.jpc60002. PMID 16533939. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/jama;295/13/1556.pdf?ijkey=Md42dlk7z9TzyL8&keytype=finite. 
  4. ^ Retrieved from package insert on 2009-03-11
  5. ^ Ashton E, Windebank E, Skiba M, et al. (January 2010). "Why did high-dose rosuvastatin not improve cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure? Mechanistic insights from the UNIVERSE study". Int J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.12.028. PMID 20085851. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167-5273(10)00002-1. 
  6. ^ "FDA Approves New Drug for Lowering Cholesterol". The Food and Drug Administration. August 12, 2003. http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2003/ANS01247.html. Retrieved 2005-03-20. 
  7. ^ Stein, Rob. Study: Blood Test Can Spot Risks for Heart Attack, Stroke The Washington Post 9 November 2008
  8. ^ Ridker PM, Danielson E, et al. (November 2008). "Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein". N. Engl. J. Med. 359 (21): 2195–207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807646. PMID 18997196. 
  9. ^ Fellstrom BC, Jardine AG, et al. (April 2009). "Rosuvastatin and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis". N. Engl. J. Med. 360 (14): 1395–1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810177. PMID 19332456. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/360/14/1395?query=TOC. 
  10. ^ Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, Cain VA, Blasetto JW. (2003). "Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial)". Am J Cardiol 92 (2): 152–60. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00530-7. PMID 12860216. 
  11. ^ <http://articles.latimes.com/2005/mar/03/nation/na-crestor3 FDA Advisory Targets Asian Patients (Los Angeles Times)>
  12. ^ <http://www.webmd.com/cholesterol-management/news/20050303/fda-updates-crestor-warning-information Asian-Americans Among Groups More at Risk of Serious Muscle Damage (WebMD)>
  13. ^ "AstraZeneca's Crestor patent upheld;No generic competition until 2016". http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20100701/BUSINESS/7010316/1003/RSS01. 
  14. ^ "CRESTOR® Patent Upheld By US Court". http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/crestor-patent-upheld-by-us-court-97435724.html. 
  15. ^ Horton, Richard (October 25 2003). "The statin wars: why AstraZeneca must retreat". Lancet 362 (9393): 1341. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14669-7. PMID 14585629. 
    McKillop T (November 1 2003). "The statin wars". Lancet 362 (9394): 1498. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14698-3. PMID 14602449. 
  16. ^ Food and Drug Administration. "Docket No. 2004P-0113/CP1" (PDF). http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/rosuvastatin/crestor_CP.pdf. 

[edit] References

[edit] External links



This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Rosuvastatin".

Need A Crestor Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was Your Health Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Looking for a Washington, DC Crestor attorney? Get in touch with one of our Washington, DC Crestor attorneys now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Crestor Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Crestor case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Unsafe Drugs: Crestor Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.